Environmental Health Reports
Search
•
RSS Feed
Executive Summary
The U.S. government’s current regulation of industrial
chemicals is based on the presumption that these chemicals are innocent until
they are proven to harm human health or the environment. This presumption is startling, especially when
you consider:
- There
are an estimated 80,000 chemicals registered for commercial use in the U.S.[1]
- Only
a very small percentage of these chemicals have been tested for safety to human
health. [2]
-
An
estimated 2,000 new chemicals are introduced each year, or an average of seven
new chemicals each day. [3]
To date, California has relied on the federal
government’s failed regulatory system to protect its residents from industrial chemicals
used in commerce. California has no regulatory framework for
reviewing these chemicals prior to their introduction to the market and use in
consumer products. Nor does the state
have a comprehensive program for assessing the safety of those chemicals
currently in use.
Last year, California
Environmental Protection Agency Secretary Linda Adams launched the Green
Chemistry Initiative to develop a comprehensive approach for dealing with
hazardous chemicals. Environment California Research
& Policy Center views
the following principles as central to chemicals policy reform and,
specifically, to the success of California’s
Green Chemistry Initiative: 1. Decisions affecting human health and the
environment should be based on the intrinsic hazards of a chemical and a new
approach to toxicity testing. 2. Chemical manufacturers should prove their products
are safe. 3. Hazardous chemicals and chemicals with
inadequate safety data should be phased out. 4.
Industry should bear the costs associated with their chemical production or
use. 5.
Safer alternatives to hazardous chemicals should be required. 6. The public has a right to know about
chemicals in use and participate in decisions affecting the impact of these
chemicals on their communities. [1] California Policy Research Center, University of California, Green
Chemistry in California: A Framework for Leadership in Chemicals Policy and Innovation, 2006.
[2] Environmental Defense Fund, Toxic Ignorance: The Continuing Absence of
Basic Health Testing for Top-Selling Chemicals in the United States, 1997. [3] Environmental Working Group, Body Burden: The Pollution in Newborns,
July 2005.
|